icon__search

83: Teaching Strength

Or, Endurance and Encouragement Unto Exaltation

November 12, 2023 • Sean Higgins • Romans 15:1–6

Back at the beginning of the application part of Paul’s letter, he told “everyone among you not to think of himself more highly then he ought to think, but to think with sober judgment, each according to the measure of faith that God has assigned” (Romans 12:3). It’s part of altar-living, actually, to live by faith, and not to put on bigger ski-boots than your skis can handle. We’re now starting into chapter 15, still talking about application for altar-living, and still talking about living by faith.


One way to measure your sober judgment on the strength of your faith is by what your strength *does*. It’s really cool that a man thinks his faith is big stuff because he can drink wine, but is he being patient with his brother whose conscience can’t? It’s preferable to be strong, Paul saw himself as strong, and he described the work of the strong as *building up others* rather than tearing down, or even just distancing from. In other words, if you’re so strong, why isn’t there more peace in your relationships? By God’s grace, the strong are strong in order to *endure*, and the greater true strength of faith in a body there is, the more harmonious the life of singing.


We show strength not because we all agree, but when we love one another through disagreements, especially about disputable things, as we’ve been considering since the start of chapter 14. The right approach here is not “Who cares?!” We are told to care, to be fully convinced, and that whatever doesn’t come from faith is *sin*; living by faith isn’t laissez faire. Loving right rights is righteous, that’s the fruit of faith, the obedience of faith. And as we care *more*, we care rightly, we keep the top care at the top, loving and serving and *pleasing* our brother.


The instructions about getting along continue into the first couple paragraphs of Romans 15. Verses 1-6 not only give a summary exhortation about strength, but a Scriptural example, and a prayer-like expectation.



# The Duty of Strength (verses 1-2)


A parent is not only supposed to be the mature one when there’s a problem, the parent is supposed to help his kid learn the right way to handle the problem, for the whole family’s benefit. So also in the church family.


> We who are strong have an obligation to bear with the failings of the weak, and not to please ourselves. Let each of us please his neighbor for his good, to build him up. (Romans 15:1–2 ESV)


This **strong** and **weak** are different words than in chapter 14, but the idea is the same. Some are more able to enjoy more things by faith, they are the strong. **Obligation** is an intriguing teaching; in this relationship the strong have an assigned *function*, they are answerable for their part.


The job is **to bear with the failings of the weak**. But this is a different use of “bear” than how we often think of “putting up with,” just enduring what is unpleasant from another person. That sort of “bearing with” is the bottom floor expectation. The obligation here is to “pick up and carry” as to a better place. The strong hold the line *for* the weak, in the places where the weak are weak. The strong are the load bearing walls for the house.


The second part of the obligation is **not to please ourselves**. Tyndale translated it as “not to stande in our owne consaytes,” in modern English: “not to stand in our own conceits,” where we let our ego and our self-regard for our preferences take precedence.


Verse 2 redirects the pleasing impulse. **Each of us** (strong and weak, with carry-over expectations mostly to the strong) the **neighbor(brother)** should **please**, and that for his good and toward edification. It’s good for our brothers to be strong, and for us to help them be strong. Strength sustains the weak, and strength begets strength.


Strength also satisfies the weak. On this obligation of pleasing, it doesn’t mean taking a survey, it doesn’t mean the weak is in the Seat of Power, it doesn’t mean the weak one immediately sees it as for his good. All of this requires wisdom and love, and nerve. Avoiding isn’t building either. But in what way can the able-ones defer for the good of the unable? There’s an example of what this looks like in the next verse.



# The Standard of Strength (verses 3-4)


If Paul had already written Philippians (which he probably didn’t for another 5 years), he could have quoted himself about the mind of Christ (Philippians 2:5-11). He still looks to the ultimate example.


> For Christ did not please himself, but as it is written, “The reproaches of those who reproached you fell on me.” For whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction, that through endurance and through the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope. (Romans 15:3–4 ESV)


There’s actually an extra conjunction at the start of verse 3, not just **for** but “For even/also” (καὶ γὰρ). Christ’s example isn’t jammed in where it doesn’t belong.


A couple things really beg for some attention here. In reading the Gospels, would you say “Christ aimed to please His neighbor?” That’s not how I’d put it, yet Paul said, **Christ did not please himself**. We’re supposed to be looking at Christ’s life as a model for our motivations. But then look at the explanation of *what it meant* that Christ didn’t please Himself, and who He was aiming to please: ** but as it is written, “The reproaches of those who reproached you fell on me.”**


It’s a quote from Psalm 69:9. It’s a David song, and applies in its context to David first. Zeal for the LORD’s house consumed David, and later was obviously applied to David’s Son, Jesus (John 2:17). And because of David’s trust in the Lord, he took the brunt of complaints from men who did not trust the Lord.


In a greater way Jesus pleased His neighbors by taking their shots, and in His case, to the point of humble death as a servant in sacrifice. He didn’t just do whatever others said that they wanted, but what was for others good, and at the greatest cost.


Paul justifies his application of the Psalm to the Messiah like he justifies application of *all* the inspired Scriptures to *us* as believers. I’m not Jesus, or David, or Moses, or Abraham, or Rahab, or Rebekah, or Samson, or all the others time fails us to tell of (see Hebrews 11:32ff). God knows we’re not Jesus, and yet He calls us through His Word to learn how to live like Jesus and the obedient saints.


We get **instruction**, teaching, from the things written beforehand, the **Scriptures**. From that teaching we get **endurance**, the ability to remain under a burden; patience is fine, but the better sense is *fortitude*. From that teaching we get **encouragement**, or comfort. It’s heavy, it hurts, but the Word gives **hope**.


Big Q: hope for *what*? For the hope that when we seek to please Christ as we love one another, He will help us and increase our harmony, *even* when people are acting like incapable babies.


Strength for the fight of faith? Strength for salt and light and witness (see Romans 15:9ff)? Strength for good works? Yes, and amen, and the Scriptures teach us *strength for getting along with each other*.



# The Gift of Strength (verses 5-6)


A benediction, a prayer, part of Paul’s vision of hope as informed by the Scriptures.


> May the God of endurance and encouragement grant you to live in such harmony with one another, in accord with Christ Jesus, that together you may with one voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. (Romans 15:5–6 ESV)


When we talk about God’s attributes, we should include His **endurance** and His **encouragement**; He is the “God of endurance and encouragement.” And when we think about why the world is the way it is, and we acknowledge that the ultimate end for which God created the world is for His glory to be known and rejoiced in, then we should sit for a bit with the reality that for God to show off His infinitely excellent endurance He’ll have ordained a lot of parts of the story we’d rather skip. Endurance is inverse to skipping, the antithesis of quitting.


He also is the God of encouragement, of consolation, of comfort.


This God has given His Word, and through that Word He gives unity in worship. We have one-another **harmony**, or we are “of the same mind” (NASB), a shared-thinking according to Christ” With the purpose for same-minded and one-mouthed glorifying God.



# Conclusion


If we’re going to be jealousable (Romans 11:13-14), we can’t be jealous of one another. If we’re going to build one another up, bitterness and suspicions (let alone backbiting, or frontbiting) must be constantly rooted out.


Be strong and strengthen others, enduring and encouraged by the Scriptures, unto hopeful and harmonic singing as worshippers of the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.


----------


## Charge


If your home WiFi was out, how quickly would you move to troubleshoot to fix it? Your expectations are on the “work” part of network. Beloved, God is increasing the stability and strength of His signal to the world. We, as brothers, are the signal. So work and live and grow in harmony.


## Benediction:


> May the God of endurance and encouragement grant you to live in such harmony with one another, in accord with Christ Jesus, that together you may with one voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. (Romans 15:5–6 ESV)

More from Romans

84: A Welcome Hope

November 19, 2023 • Sean Higgins • Romans 15:7–13

Hope is as good as God’s Word. We learn what hope is, and what our hope is in, from Scripture. The strength and power of our hope comes from the trustworthiness of Scripture. Our confidence in what Scripture tells us to hope for in the future comes from what Scripture reveals about all the realities that God has fulfilled so far. That should sound advent/Christmas related. In fact I’ve used Romans 15:4-13 four times in our annual Christmas Eve service Scripture readings. Just as God promised to send a Savior to earth and did, so also God promised to set up a King in a kingdom on earth, which He will. One good advent deserves another, and here we are learning how to behave and wait—while everyone doesn’t agree on everything—*in hope*. Since the start of Romans 14 the instruction is about living in light of the coming Lord’s unique position. He is the one to whom we will give account, He is our Master, we serve Him. So we can get off our brother’s case regarding his diet choices. We pray for the kingdom to come to earth as it is in heaven, and we reckon that the kingdom is a matter of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit (14:17). So eat and honor the Lord and give thanks or *don’t* eat, yet still with honor and thanks. Either way, take off the judgy-pants and put on your joy-pants. *Welcome* your brother (15:7), like 14:1. Welcoming is how it started, and welcoming should be how it’s going. How it started was receiving, and how it’s going is still receiving *with hope that it’s going to happen for God’s glory*. For all of the possible problems between people, God’s purpose and God’s power are still on track to accomplish all God’s promises. That’s a reason for hope. # Glorious Welcome (verse 7) Based on God’s granting of unity to glorify Him (verses 5-6), there is responsibility to embrace that unity. > Therefore welcome one another as Christ has welcomed you, for the glory of God. (Romans 15:7 ESV) **Welcome** is the same word and imperative as opened this section of the letter in 14:1. It has the idea of taking toward (oneself), of receiving as into one’s home or circle of acquaintances. Open the door and invite them in. The strong were told to *welcome* the weak in faith (14:1), and the weak were told to stop judging the eaters because of God’s *welcome* (14:4). The **one another** in 15:7 covers them both. And the standard calls us to level up. Don’t just *welcome* because Christ is Lord, but *welcome* **just as also Christ received you.** Christ bore reproaches of God’s enemies to receive His people, and that all happened **for the glory of God**. But this must also apply to us *welcoming* others like Christ. Do you want to glorify God? It is as obvious as patterning your welcome of the brothers after Jesus, and as onerous. Study the Scriptures for endurance/encouragement/example and welcome your brothers for the glory of God. # Covenant Welcome (verse 8) The welcome of Christ gets higher than divisions about disputable matters and touches people groups. > For I tell you that Christ became a servant to the circumcised to show God’s truthfulness, in order to confirm the promises given to the patriarchs, (Romans 15:8 ESV) This has explanatory power for our welcoming of one another over issues of meat and wine and days and such, but bringing in the Jew/Gentile distinction doesn’t map onto strong/weak differences, as if one ethnicity of Christian necessarily was more able or less able in choices by faith. If there is one thing we’ve learned, it’s that (almost) anyone can have any problem. That said, the problem between Jewish Christians and non-Jewish Christians was a thing that required a lot of parchment in the first few centuries of the church. The believers in Rome were living with such tensions. Even though most Jews rejected Jesus as Messiah and would not confess Him as Lord, Paul, a Jew (Romans 9:3), said **Christ has become a servant to the circumcision on behalf of the truth of God** (NASB). What is the **truth**? It’s **the promises given to the patriarchs**. And what were those promises? They had heard about a Seed who would save them (Genesis 3:15). The Lord promised to make Abraham a great nation, to bless that people and make them a blessing (Genesis 12:1-3), and to give them promised land (Genesis 13:14-15). Why refer to them as **the circumcision** rather than “Jews” or “Israelites” as previously in Romans? Probably because circumcision was the sign of the Abrahamic *Covenant* (Genesis 17:4-13). To the Israelites belonged the covenants and the patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob) and the Christ (Romans 9:4-5). Christ served the circumcised **in order to confirm the promises**. It’s important that Paul does not say in order to *fulfill* the promises, as if all the promises had been *completed* by Christ. They have been **confirmed**, “put beyond doubt” (BAGD), validated. The Gentiles might have thought that God was finished with Israel, but they shouldn’t have. The Jews are welcomed by Christ because of God’s covenant. # Merciful Welcome (verses 9-12) The Scriptures that were given for endurance and encouragement that lead to hope also foresaw a Son of Jacob/Israel that would save *the world*. Salvation blessings were covenanted to Israel and purposed for the nations. > and in order that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy. (Romans 15:9 ESV) The only covenant made with the nations is that God would not destroy them with a flood (Genesis 9), though even that was technically a covenant to Noah, and there weren’t any nations at that point. And yet, while choosing Israel as His national people, God purposed to bring Himself glory through every tribe, tongue, language, and people. He would show them **His mercy**. The good news is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek (Romans 1:16). All this was *prophesied*. No Scripture proofs were needed to corroborate Christ’s receiving of Jews; it would have been surprising if Israel did not receive God’s mercy. These multiple texts, though, leave no doubt about mercy extended; it shouldn’t have been surprising that Gentiles would receive God’s mercy. Paul weaves together four quotes in a row, from the Law, the Writings/Psalms, and the Prophets. The Jews might not have expected Christ to welcome the Gentiles, but only if they didn’t read their Scriptures. The first Scripture is Psalm 18:49. > As it is written, > “Therefore I will praise you among the Gentiles, > and sing to your name.” (Romans 15:9 ESV) The second Scripture is Deuteronomy 32:43. > And again it is said, > “Rejoice, O Gentiles, with his people.” (Romans 15:10 ESV) The third Scripture is Psalm 117:1. > And again, > “Praise the Lord, all you Gentiles, > and let all the peoples extol him.” (Romans 15:11 ESV) The fourth Scripture is Isaiah 11:10. > And again Isaiah says, > “The root of Jesse will come, > even he who arises to rule the Gentiles; > in him will the Gentiles hope.” (Romans 15:12 ESV) Jesus is the Son of David, and it was to David that God covenanted a descendent who would be the King of kings. The Gentiles are welcomed by Christ because of God’s mercy. # Hopeful Welcome (verse 13) Just as I argued that the benediction/prayer ended the previous paragraph (verses 5-6), so this section ends with another fantastic expression of divine blessing. > May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, so that by the power of the Holy Spirit you may abound in hope. (Romans 15:13 ESV) The **God of hope** compares with “the God of endurance and encouragement” in verse 5. The reference to the **Holy Spirit** compares to “the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ” in verse 6; it’s a Trinitarian project. The God of hope is enabling and empowering **hope**. Three times **hope** in verses 12-13. There is hope for you, hope for me, hope for the world, hope by the Spirit through the Word in the Son of the God of hope. God fills us that we might overflow/**abound in hope**. # Conclusion If we are not allowed to despise a brother over meat, which he can choose, we certainly are not allowed to despise a brother over his ethnicity, which he did not and cannot choose. It’s a welcome hope, as in, a hope better than we were hoping for. It’s also a hope that enables us to welcome others. The only reason we don’t laugh at this international praising project is because we can look back at almost two-thousand years of God’s mercy in the lives of disciples of all nations. The Lord’s covenant and promises are on their way to being fulfilled, but it has not all happened just yet. The promises to the patriarchs are not completed, nor are they consumed in Christ as the terminal end; they will all be fulfilled *through* Him. Our Lord, come! Be strong in the Lord and in the strength of His mercy to all peoples, and so welcome one another as Christ has welcomed you, for the glory of God. ---------- ## Charge Give thanks for the Messiah who confirms promises. Give thanks for the mercy of God that teaches you to rejoice. Give thanks, with all joy, and praise the Lord with your mouths, in songs and at suppers. Look to the Lord who blesses us, and who will return to rule us all. ## Benediction: > May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, so that by the power of the Holy Spirit you may abound in hope. (Romans 15:13 ESV)

82: Blessed and Building Up

November 5, 2023 • Sean Higgins • Romans 14:19–23

I’ve referred to this before, (as James Clear wrote) that "Your outcomes are a lagging measure of your habits. Your net worth is a lagging measure of your financial habits. Your weight is a lagging measure of your eating habits” and so forth. Likewise a church’s (shared) peace is a lagging measure of each member’s habits of dying to bring life. Peace is a hard thing to pursue directly, but it is impossible to achieve without wanting it. I also like to remind us every once in a while that we always do what we *most* want to do. We might have multiple wants, and some of those wants compete or even conflict with each other. But the strongest want will win. Christians can tell what they want most, in the main, by what they have (their possessions are a lagging measure of their pursuits). It’s a decent mirror, regularly not flattering. Christians who want to look good more than do good will probably get what they want. Christians who want to be right more than anything will get that reputation; they’ll be known for their want (probably more than actual wisdom). Christians who want to be left alone will make little effort to the opposite. Christians who fight for their Christian liberty will at least think that the bruises are a result of them fighting the good fight, though the good is debatable. And, Christians who want other members to be blessed will try to build them up and “live peaceably with all” (Romans 12:18). Sola fide in Romans 3 might be easier to understand and practice than this application for those who are saved by grace in Christ in Romans 14. Submitting to the truths of God’s sovereignty in Romans 9 requires less sacrifice than this application for those who are serving for the glory of God alone in Romans 14. There are a few better-thans in verses 19-23. I actually think that it’s possible to see the connections/divisions in Paul’s thought better than what read in our verse divisions, and even the paragraph division. Verse 19 ends the previous paragraph in the ESV, I think it makes a better lead-off statement for the final paragraph. Wherever it’s better to put the tab-space, we’re going to cover it, and see three points. # Building Up Is Better Than Tearing Down (verses 19-20a) In the kingdom of God, righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit have precedence. We should show this precedence in what we pursue. > So then let us pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding. Do not, for the sake of food, destroy the work of God. (Romans 14:19-20a ESV) The contrast is between building up and tearing down, as with walls. Christians will construct or destruct *their own structure*. **So then** swings from verses 13-18, if not from 1-13. We’re to judge/decide never to stumble or trap or destroy a brother when it comes to disputable things (especially as the weak have convictions/opinions about things without a verse and turn their preference into a “THIS ONLY IS RIGHTEOUS!”). Here’s what we should do. “We should pursue the (things) of peace and the (things) of one-another building.” Note that peace is not the direct object. But peace has “things” that go with it, **what makes for** peace. So with **upbuilding**, a word that describes actual house-building (οἰκοδομή), the structure from construction, and so spiritually here as desiring the strengthening, the edifying, of our fellow house members. We are one body, we are one house. **Pursue** the peace and edification things. Chase, seek, strive for. *WANT IT*. Every believer’s “aim should be to help one another rather than to criticize or despise” (Morris). And so we’re prohibited from working against God. God is strengthening, and we are not to **destroy** or “tear down” (NASB) or do demolition when it comes to disputable things, like **food**. This is a broad word for eaten things, while meat and wine are mentioned explicitly in the next verse. **The work of God** is either your brother himself, or the household of brothers, a.k.a., the body, the church. # Fellowship Is Better Than Flaunting (verses 20b-22a) We’re reminded of the hierarchy of rights. > Everything is indeed clean, but it is wrong for anyone to make another stumble by what he eats. It is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble. The faith that you have, keep between yourself and God. (Romans 14:20b-22a ESV) In verse 14 Paul said “nothing is unclean in itself,” and in the middle of verse 20 he says, on the one hand, “all things (are) pure.” But there is another hand, and it’s the hand that ranks higher. There is **clean**/pure=καθαρὰ, but it is κακὸν=evil/**wrong** to eat and make a mess for your brother. καλὸν=**good**/right **not to eat meat or drink wine**, which refers to alcohol for the first time specifically in the chapter. But just as Paul said, “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31), so he says *don’t* eat or *don’t* drink or *don’t* do whatever would cause your brother to fall. The first sentence in verse 22 belongs with this instruction, and is important for any number of things it does *not* mean. To **keep (your faith) between yourself and God** does not mean that faith is private or personal, as modern men often speak, as if faith could be separated from public or secular choices. Meat and wine are daily dinner stuff, or even potluck party stuff. “Keep ” (ESV) makes it sound quiet, but “have your own conviction before God” (NASB) means you are ready to give an account of yourself to God (verse 12). This is another way to say be fully convinced in your mind (verse 5), an introduction to doing what we do with a clear conscience (next in verse 22). Not eating meat or drinking wine doesn’t mean a once-and-for-all transition to vegetarian or tea-totaler. It doesn’t mean never eating in the privacy of your home. This whole chapter assumes discussion about disagreements. We only know that a brother is upset when there’s discussion; we cannot read his thoughts. In that discussion, following Paul’s example, we look at the truth, that “nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving” (1 Timothy 4:4), *and* that not all can be thankful for it *yet*, and so we don’t need to flaunt it. Both the stronger and weaker brothers have temptations, but they are to remember that 1) God has welcomed the brother, 2) we live and die as the Lord’s, 3) we will give an account to God, and 4) we ought to want blessing for our brother. Fellowship is better than rubbing our preferences in a brother’s face. # Blessed Is Better Than Condemned (verses 22b-23) We will eat, but not all will eat blessing. > Blessed is the one who has no reason to pass judgment on himself for what he approves. But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats, because the eating is not from faith. For whatever does not proceed from faith is sin. (Romans 14:22b-23 ESV) The two people: “the one not judging himself by what he’s approved,” and “the one doubting what he’s (functionally approved by) eating.” One is **blessed**, one is **condemned**. Don’t go against your conscience, and, seek to inform your conscience with what is right. (See also Ecclesiastes 9:7.) **All which (is) not from faith is sin.** From faith to faith is a big deal (starting from Romans 1:17). Decisions and fellowship must not be driven by fear or guilt. A church eating and drinking but not by faith is pagan/worldly. A church not eating and drinking in the name of faith but really out of anxiety is weak. A church ripping each other’s decisions to shreds cannot say it’s by faith. # Conclusion We can work it out or get offended. We can work it out or stay immature. We can work it out or always be finding a new group of people to blame; church hop to shift blame. Pursuing peace is more than leaving others alone, and building them up in blessing is a *habit* to *pursue*. Food is better and blessed with faith. Fellowship is better and blessed by faith. Living by faith is the *only* way of salvation, the only way to have a clear conscience, the only way to please God, the only way of righteousness, the only way of recognizing that all are yours, and the only way of *fellowship*, at least for now. May the Lord make us strong in faith and blessed with peace and full of jealousable joy as His spiritual house. ---------- ## Charge When David fled from Saul and lived in the land ruled by Achish/Ambimelech, and acted insane and let spittle run down his beard to show that there was no reason for Achish to fear him, he had good reason to think about the man who desires life and wants to see good. Such a man would “Turn away from evil and do good; seek peace and pursue it” (Psalm 34:14). So, Christian, in these days of great insanity, you must seek and strive for the things of peace and the things that build up your brothers. ## Benediction: > The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all. (2 Corinthians 13:14 ESV)

81: The Right of Rights

October 29, 2023 • Sean Higgins • Romans 14:13–18

There are three kinds of *right* in this paragraph. There is the kind of right that is not wrong, the kind of right that is a liberty, and the kind of right that is relational. With these three rights you can think something correctly, do something freely, enjoy something supremely. It’s great when all three line up together, but when they can’t, there is a *right* right, a highest right, a ranked right. As there is a holy of holies, so there is a right of rights. Paul continues his instructions about *disputable things* into the second half of Romans 14, and doesn’t finish until well into chapter 15. It’s a chapter and a half of instructions about loving our neighbor-brother, a thing that is of utmost importance and also of utmost difficulty. As disappointing as that is, it’s no surprise that our enemy would love nothing more than to attack at key fronts. The evil one hates nothing more than our joyful fellowship with each other. What is right and true is that all are yours. What is right and liberty is that you can enjoy, by faith in Christ, all that is yours. And what is right and relational is that your brother is among the all, fellowship with your brother is above the all. All are yours to enjoy, or to enjoy *not* enjoying, if that makes life with your brother better. Your brother is yours more than barbecue is yours. When we put barbecue over brother we’re burning the wrong ends. It’s possible to miss the right of rights in the name of lesser rights. We’ve seen it already in verses 1-12. We are judgment-making creatures, and one of the most important judgments we can make is to stop judging our brothers over disputable things. Judgment cuts two ways. The strong, referring to those who see and eat more freely by faith, judge-despise those who abstain (verse 3), and the weak, referring to those with more strict rules about what’s right, judge-condemn those who partake (also verse 3). We’re supposed to be convinced about what we do or don’t (verse 5), and we’re supposed to be honoring the Lord and thanking God in what we do or don’t (verse 6). All are ours, and we are the Lord’s (verse 8). Sanctification is a process of learning to love righteousness more than sin, which includes learning to love all the gifts and blessings that make us jealousable, and that involves learning that fellowship with the brothers trumps personal convenience/preference. We’ve been delivered from the domain of darkness and transferred into the kingdom of His beloved Son (Colossians 1:13), in whom we have righteousness and fellowship between saints. We ought not live like we’re still in the old kingdom, the kingdom of the world, where self-serving and distance and despising others is the way. There is the right requirement in verse 13, the right principle in verse 14, the right explanation in verse 15, the right conclusion in verse 16, and the right precedence in verses 17-18. # The Right Requirement (verse 13) Here’s more required response about judging. > Therefore let us not pass judgment on one another any longer, but rather decide never to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of a brother. (Romans 14:13 ESV) Paul uses the same word negatively (**pass judgment**) and positively (**decide**) in both halves of this sentence. I think it’s less word play and more to show that it’s the application of judging that is good or bad, not the action of judging itself. We judge, but what and by what do we judge? We should **not pass judgment** on a brother, but we should **[judge] never to put a stumbling block** before a brother. This sequence adds to the requirements in verses 1-13. In that section we were to judge with right thinking about our brother, here we’re to judge that we could hurt our brother by doing what is technically right. A **stumbling block** and a **hindrance** share the quality of making difficult or even causing pain. One includes the idea of offending, the other of trapping. “Hindrance” is especially a weak translation compared to “occasion to fall” (KJV) or “pitfall” (HCSB), a thing that could entice one to sin. How might we make it more difficult for a brother? Not just by despising him, though that’s not right. We can make things more difficult for a brother by exercising lesser rights as if they were the highest right. # The Right Principle (verse 14) Only one English translation actually uses brackets around verse 14 (the HCSB), but the idea is what we might think of as kind of an inline footnote. > I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself, but it is unclean for anyone who thinks it unclean. (Romans 14:14 ESV) Because Jesus is Lord, and because we are in Him, all are ours (see 1 Corinthians 3:21-22). It’s hard to imagine a more emphatic way for Paul to put it. All the days, all the meats, all the wine, all the liberties are his, are ours (All the fulness-Psalm 24:1, the meat on a thousand hills-Psalm 50:10). The **unclean** terminology is basically “common,” as opposed to the sacred. The weaker brother thinks more things are unclean than are truly unclean. There’s great similarity in what Paul told the Corinthian Christians in 1 Corinthians 8. Whether or not the Roman Christians were struggling with the morality of meat offered to idols, the stronger-freer consciences relating to the weaker-encumbered consciences *is* the same. The true-right is that **nothing is unclean in itself**, clean/unclean isn’t a built-in of material things. So prohibition is not Paul’s principle. The liberty-right is to enjoy more, but the fact that not all see these first two right principles requires more. # The Right Explanation (verse 15) With the parenthesis out of the way, Paul explains more about the requirement. > For if your brother is grieved by what you eat, you are no longer walking in love. By what you eat, do not destroy the one for whom Christ died. (Romans 14:15 ESV) The strong can **grieve** and **destroy** the weak (as can the weak grieve the strong, but that’s not the primary burden here). Giving grief that isn’t good is not only bad, it’s the opposite of loving one’s neighbor and it’s incompatible with the loving sacrifice of Christ. The atonement of Christ brings forgiveness and blessing and life, and to work against that works against the very purpose of the cross. The grief/destruction isn’t loss of salvation, but loss of thanks and joy in going against what faith allows. As I said, this is mostly aimed at the strong, But, can you see application for the weak? When the weak *claim* grief and hurt, when the weak use these claims to control, they are likewise grieving (with extra rules) and destroying (joy and liberty). Grief charges become weapons, and grievance mongers/victims are making a killing in our culture. # The Right Conclusion (verse 16) You’re fully convinced that all are yours and that all is good, but depending on how you hold it, you can make it look bad. > So do not let what you regard as good be spoken of as evil. (Romans 14:16 ESV) Don’t let “your the good” be blasphemed. You’re convinced about a good gift, and it causes someone else great grief. You give thanks for it (see verse 6), they bad mouth it. You can’t guarantee that someone won’t slander you. We’re blessed when we’re truly slandered, that is, when it’s a real lie. But we’re still in brother-with-one-another context, still in community fellowship, and there’s a way to love what you love—even when the “what” is right—and the other person is *right* to have nothing good to say about the “good.” # The Right Precedence (verses 17-18) Here’s another explanation for why we should recognize the right of fights based on the kind of subculture we live in. > For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. Whoever thus serves Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men. (Romans 14:17–18 ESV) The **kingdom of God** is the rule of God (mentioned only here in Romans). What are the keys to the kingdom? What has precedence in this kingdom? It is *not* externals *first*. This does not fulfill all the kingdom promises, but we are living differently in God’s rule now than will be when His kingdom is on earth as it is in heaven (which we pray to come!). In the meantime, the fellows who share the kingdom should share a fellowship. In this kingdom**righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit** have precedence. All of these are relational issues, and in this context we’re talking about *horizontal*/one-anothers and not vertical/Lord-servant issues. This is right/**acceptable** in the sight of God, as it is right/**approved** in the sight of men. Pleasing ourselves is *not* to be the precedence (see Romans 15:1, 3). # Conclusion Nothing in this paragraph is a discouragement against conversation, or teaching, *toward the better right of broad reception*. Don’t forget Paul’s parenthetical principle in verse 14. Keep in mind that disagreeing is not despising, and sharpening by a brother is not necessarily the brother condescending. Paul is not shutting down conversation, but he is shutting down condescension. Be patient, be kind, clothe yourselves with humility, grow up, give more thanks. Watch when you are eager for a fight. The strong are not strong because they have liberty not to love, their strength is what enables more liberty in how they love. Let’s pursue peace and building up one another (verse 19), living from faith to faith (verse 23). ---------- ## Charge Christian, at present you live in two cities, two kingdoms, the city of man and the kingdom of God. You will show which kingdom you value most by which kingdom’s gold you treasure most. Pursue *righteousness* and *peace* and *joy* in the Holy Spirit to build up and bless your brothers. ## Benediction: > So we do not lose heart. Though our outer self is wasting away, our inner self is being renewed day by day. For this light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison, as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal. (2 Corinthians 4:16–18, ESV)