Religious Wickedness Meets Perfect Righteousness

Founders Baptist Church

Media Give App

Religious Wickedness Meets Perfect Righteousness

Matthew 26:57-68

March 3, 2024 • Richard Caldwell Jr. • Matthew 26:57–68

Give

Introduction:

Jesus has been arrested in the garden, and now He will endure two trials, each trial having three phases, within the span of just a few hours.

Our God not only tells us that Jesus was taken through trials — He shows us WITH DETAILS that these trials were a mockery of justice and an attack on righteousness.

What does He mean for us to see?

Well, as we will be reminded throughout our study of these trials, the innocence of God’s Son is being demonstrated and documented.

The facts are set before us that demonstrate that though He died the death of a criminal, there was no guilt in Him. As an apologetic for the gospel, as answer for unbelieving critics of Christianity, the record must be clear concerning what Jesus was charged with and what the truth was about those charges, and the gospel writers provide us with that clear record.

But something else stands out at the same time. We see the wickedness of those who wanted Him dead. AND THAT WICKEDNESS WAS ON DISPLAY IN THE LIVES OF RELIGIOUS LEADERS.

IT ALERTS US TO THE FACT THAT GREAT WICKEDNESS CAN EXIST IN THE RELIGIOUS REALM.

IT ALSO TELLS US HOW THAT RELIGIOUS WICKEDNESS BEHAVED.

IT WAS NOW RELIGIOUS WICKEDNESS THAT HAD ITS HANDS ON PERFECT RIGHTEOUSNESS.

THE KINGDOM OF DARKNESS HAD ITS HANDS ON THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD.

How does religious wickedness treat perfect righteousness?

ESV Acts 2:23 this Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men.

This is what you see in the trial that was held before Caiaphas the high priest.

There are two distinct phases to the trials of Jesus prior to His condemnation and crucifixion. There is the Jewish phase, and then the Roman phase.

The Jewish phase represents RELIGIOUS WICKEDNESS.

The Roman phase represents CIVIL WICKEDNESS.

And as we look at the Jewish phase of Christ’s trials there are five things I want us to see about religious wickedness when it is met with perfect righteousness.

Now, something I want to say before we look at these five things.

THE TRUE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST HAS ALWAYS KNOWN AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT WICKEDNESS OFTEN DRESSES IN THE ROBES OF RELIGION.

Lost humanity wants to group all religion together.

Lost people want to believe that ALL THAT CALLS ITSELF CHRISTIANITY IS CHRISTIANITY, and that Christianity is no different than any of the world’s religions.

Lost people also want to believe that Christians would defend anything and everything that is dressed in religious garb.

This is not true, and it has NEVER been true.

THE BIBLE IS ABSOLUTELY CLEAR FROM BEGINNING TO END THAT THERE IS TRUE RELIGION AND FALSE RELIGION.

THE BIBLE IS ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT SATAN OFTEN COMES AS AN ANGEL OF LIGHT.

THE BIBLE IS ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT FALSE PROFESSORS EXIST, HAVE ALWAYS EXISTED, AND JUDAS IS JUST THE MOST HEINOUS EXAMPLE OF THAT.

Paul was warning churches in the first century about false Christs.

ESV 2 Corinthians 11:4 For if someone comes and proclaims another Jesus than the one we proclaimed, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or if you accept a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it readily enough.

THE TRIALS OF OUR LORD DEMONSTRATE THE HATEFULNESS, THE CRUELTY, THE DISHONESTY, THE DISREGARD FOR JUSTICE, THAT CAN EXIST IN THE REALM OF PUBLIC RELIGION.

What do we see in Christ’s trial before Caiaphas?

I. RELIGIOUS WICKEDNESS ON DISPLAY IN THE CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL (vs.57-58)

The first place where religious wickedness is on display is in the way that Christ’s trial was conducted.

WHEN WE TALK ABOUT CHRIST’S JEWISH TRIAL, JUST KNOW THAT WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT IS SOMETHING THE JEWS KNEW TO BE PRELIMINARY TO THE CASE THEY WOULD HAVE TO MAKE TO THE ROMANS.

This, then, is more like a trial before the trial.

As we noted already, this part of Christ’s trials had three phases.

First, they took him before Annas.

ESV John 18:12 So the band of soldiers and their captain and the officers of the Jews arrested Jesus and bound him. 13 First they led him to Annas, for he was the father-in-law of Caiaphas, who was high priest that year. 14 It was Caiaphas who had advised the Jews that it would be expedient that one man should die for the people.

Both Annas and Caiaphas are called the high priest because Annas held the office in the legitimate way (and it was lifelong), and Caiaphas was the latest of the handpicked office-holders by Rome.

James Montgomery Boice — “The first part of the Jewish trial was a preliminary hearing before Annas. This seems to be what John describes in his Gospel (John 18:19–24), though the issue is somewhat confusing because John calls both Annas and Caiaphas “the high priest.” The reason he does so is because Annas was the true high priest, appointed for life as high priests were. But the Romans had replaced him with Caiaphas, the son-in-law of Annas, so that both held the title at the same time.” [1]

ESV Luke 3:2 during the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John the son of Zechariah in the wilderness.

Annas was the first stop, likely, for two reasons. One, he still has authority in the eyes of the Jewish people. He seems to be the power behind the power. So, this would be the logical first stop.

But there is likely a darker purpose behind this first phase. They start with Annas in the hopes that Jesus might incriminate Himself, but Jesus’ answers frustrated Annas.

ESV John 18:19 The high priest then questioned Jesus about his disciples and his teaching. 20 Jesus answered him, "I have spoken openly to the world. I have always taught in synagogues and in the temple, where all Jews come together. I have said nothing in secret. 21 Why do you ask me? Ask those who have heard me what I said to them; they know what I said." 22 When he had said these things, one of the officers standing by struck Jesus with his hand, saying, "Is that how you answer the high priest?" 23 Jesus answered him, "If what I said is wrong, bear witness about the wrong; but if what I said is right, why do you strike me?" 24 Annas then sent him bound to Caiaphas the high priest.

Jesus is treated violently, and as He points out, without cause.

[1]James Montgomery Boice, The Triumph of the King (Matthew 18–28), vol. 13 of Boice Expositional Commentary. Accordance electronic ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2001), 582-583.

The Living Christ & A Long-Term Plan

April 21, 2024 • Richard Caldwell Jr. • Matthew 28:16–20

The Bible is inspired. Matthew wrote exactly what God ordained for him to write. But if you understand inspiration correctly, then you know that his mind and his desires were at work in what he wrote. And so, I ask myself, “If you are Matthew, how do you end an account of the life of Jesus?” You are an eyewitness of many of the things you write about. You present the eyewitness accounts of others. You are presenting Jesus of Nazareth as the Son of God, as the Israel’s King, as the Savior for the world — how do you end your account of His life and work and promises? Matthew ends this account in a very short space. It almost feels abrupt. But he has made his case, and as he ends, he chooses to do so in a way that explains where we are at the present time. This is where Matthew’s emphasis is when he finishes. HE TELLS US WHY WE ARE WHERE WE ARE — WHY WE ARE ABOUT WHAT WE ARE ABOUT. HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN WHAT THE DISCIPLES HAVE DONE AND ARE DOING SINCE CHRIST’S DEATH AND RESURRECTION? HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THE FAITH OF THESE MEN WHO WOULD GO ON TO GIVE THEIR LIVES FOR THE TRUTHS THAT MATTHEW RECORDS? HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN WHAT THE CHURCH IS TO BE ABOUT FOR THE REST OF ITS EXISTENCE — UNTIL JESUS RETURNS. The answer is that our Lord’s meeting with His men, following His resurrection, SET THAT COURSE. Matthew ends by giving us the living Christ’s long-term plan for His disciples. It is a vital thing that we remember that genuine Christianity is not inventive, it is submissive. It is vital that we are always clear about the fact that any valid philosophy of ministry has not be created individually, out of the mind of man, but simply reflects the reception of revelation — that is, we have heard and believed what God has set forth in His word, and we are striving to obey it. SUBMISSION TO WHAT GOD HAS REVEALED EXPLAINS MINISTRY THAT PLEASES GOD AND IS POWERFULLY USED BY GOD. And all that goes back as far as the charge that Jesus gave to His disciples when He gathered them together in Galilee after His resurrection. We finish our journey in Matthew this morning by looking at Matthew’s close under two main headings. I. THE MEETING WITH JESUS (vs.16-17) Our Lord had sent news through the women — by the angel and from Himself personally — that His disciples were to meet Him in Galilee. The disciples obeyed. They made their way to Galilee and to a mountain which Jesus had designated. Matthew describes them as the eleven. He reminds us that Jesus chose these men for a special task. There were many followers of Jesus, many disciples of Jesus, but the eleven are now in a special class. They are the Lord’s apostles. It also reminds us that they are no longer “the twelve” because Judas had his good things, and threw his privileged place away for a lie. Matthew begins verse 16 with a mild adversative (de or but) and reminds us that this is the best answer to the lies of the council. THEY SAID HE IS STILL DEAD AND THAT HIS DISCIPLES STOLE HIS BODY, BUT HIS DISCIPLES MADE THEIR WAY TO GALILEE AND MET WITH HIM. The Lord is very much alive. The Lord’s choice to meet them in Galilee is instructive also. D.A. Carson — “Associating the Great Commission (vv. 18–20) with Galilee not only has nuances with Jesus’ humble background and the theme of Gentile mission (see comments at v. 10) but “ensures that the risen Christ and his teaching are not thought of as a substitute for, but as continuous with, Jesus’ ministry and teaching in Galilee” (Hill).#_ftn1 The one whom they meet with, and will spend their lives proclaiming, is the very same one they have been following throughout Galilee, and He does not need Jerusalem’s approval to save His sheep all over the world. I mentioned last week that I fear we become so accustomed to what we read in Scripture that sometimes we become insensitive to the wonder of it. We are so familiar with it that we don’t recognize how SHOCKING it would have been to the people who lived through these events — how shocking it would be to us right now! We have read about the resurrection. We have read about Jesus calling people, like Lazarus, out from death. BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN THAT, and we underestimate how DIFFICULT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN WITHOUT WHAT WE ARE NOW PRIVILEGED TO HOLD IN OUR HANDS (the Bible). These people didn’t have the gospel accounts, they LIVED what became the gospel accounts. SO THAT MATTHEW HONESTLY COMMUNICATES THE FACT THAT THERE WAS SOME INITIAL DOUBT AMONG THE APOSTLES. MATTHEW TELLS US THREE THINGS. A. THOSE DISCIPLES SAW JESUS What Matthew doesn’t tell us is that the disciples would see Jesus on other occasions. He limits himself to this occasion but makes the point that the idea of Christ resurrected is not “a story that gained traction.” They don’t believe in a resurrection because a body went missing, and the story given to explain it was naively believed. NO, IN CONTRAST TO THAT, THESE MEN WERE EYEWITNESSES OF THE RISEN CHRIST. They saw Jesus alive. B. THOSE DISCIPLES WORSHIPPED JESUS The disciples bow before the Lord Jesus. What Matthew indicates by this is that they not only see Jesus, but they also BELIEVE WHAT THEY ARE SEEING. They worship their Master. C. SOME OF THOSE DISCIPLES STRUGGLED TO BELIEVE IT WAS REAL But then he says, “but some doubted.” The word διστάζω does not indicate settled unbelief. Rather it speaks of hesitation. SEVERAL QUESTIONS EMERGE FROM THIS. #_ftnref1 D. A. Carson, https://ref.ly/logosres/ebcrev09?ref=bible.mt28.16&off=637&ctx=in+26%3a32%3b+28%3a7%2c+10.+~associating+the+grea in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Matthew–Mark (Revised Edition), ed. Tremper Longman III and David E. Garland, vol. 9 (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2010), 663.

Enemies of The Resurrected Christ

April 21, 2024 • Richard Caldwell Jr. • Matthew 28:1–10

Introduction: Matthew tells us of two disciples, two women, who met with the wonder of the resurrection through an encounter with an angel and then met with the resurrected Christ Himself. These women were characterized by devotion, amazement, worship, joy, and an immediate desire to obey the instruction they were given and to report the good news to the Lord’s disciples. But, as we have seen with the crucifixion of Jesus, and the burial of Jesus, we now meet with response of Christ’s enemies to the resurrection of Jesus. What do we see in the enemies of Christ as they respond to the reality that He has been raised from the dead? Tonight, we see four characteristics of these enemies of Christ as they respond to His resurrection. I. UNWILLING RECIPIENTS OF MERCY (vs.11) After all the ways that the chief priests, along with the other religious leaders of the Jews, had sinned — blasphemy, lying, manipulation, mockery, cruelty, MURDER — they are now receiving a report. The guards who had been charged with securing the tomb, now made their way to the chief priests to tell them about everything that had happened. These men now knew, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that everything Jesus promised about His death and resurrection was true. REMEMBER, they claimed that if Jesus was delivered from death, they would believe in Him. ESV Matthew 27:42 "He saved others; he cannot save himself. He is the King of Israel; let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him. 43 He trusts in God; let God deliver him now, if he desires him. For he said, 'I am the Son of God.'" Yes, they were talking about Him coming down from the cross, but what they heard about now was even greater. HE WAS DELIVERED BY GOD AFTER DYING. THEY ALSO MADE CLEAR THAT THEY KNEW THAT JESUS CLAIMED THAT THIS WOULD HAPPEN. They called that DECEPTION. They said that He was a deceiver. ESV Matthew 27:63 and said, "Sir, we remember how that impostor said, while he was still alive, 'After three days I will rise.' 64 Therefore order the tomb to be made secure until the third day, lest his disciples go and steal him away and tell the people, 'He has risen from the dead,' and the last fraud will be worse than the first." WELL, NOW THEY KNEW THAT HE WASN’T A DECEIVER. THEY RECEIVED NEWS FROM THE GUARDS: They heard about the earthquake. They heard about the angel and his dazzling appearance. They heard about the empty tomb. IT WAS A TREMENDOUS MERCY THAT THESE RELIGIOUS LEADERS WERE STILL ALIVE TO HEAR ABOUT THESE THINGS. God could have justly struck them dead for what they had done with His Son. But here they are given another opportunity. Here was their opportunity for repentance. Here was their opportunity to fall on their faces and admit their sinful foolishness and their need for forgiveness, and the truth — Jesus is the Messiah. II. BRAZEN OPPONENTS OF THE TRUTH (vs.12-13) What do they do instead? They prove themselves to be BRAZEN. Bold, without shame, when they should have been full of shame. The chief priests gather with the elders, and they decide to SPREAD A LIE. NOTE: THIS RESPONSE PROVES THAT IT WAS NEVER REALLY ABOUT EVIDENCE. This is one of the most amazing things the world has ever seen. A man is questioned about signs that would prove He is the Messiah. He answers that the sign will be His resurrection. They take steps to kill Him. He is then raised from the dead. You hear this from eyewitnesses who are not motivated to lie about this. YET YOU DON’T STOP YOUR OPPOSITION? IT PROVES THAT WHAT THE JEWISH LEADERS DID, THEY DID DESPITE EVIDENCE, NOT FOR LACK OF IT. This has never changed. People claim that they don’t believe because they don’t have enough evidence when the evidence that they have is already overwhelming to any honest mind. NOTE: NEVER THINK THAT PEOPLE ENTER THE KINGDOM BY INTELLECTUAL PERSUASION. THEY ENTER THE KINGDOM WHEN THEY ARE BORN AGAIN. What you see in these religious leaders is the fruit of their sinful natures. This is SINFUL UNBELIEF. This is STUBBORN UNBELIEF. This is DISHONEST, WILLFUL, UNBELIEF. And so, they choose to construct a lie and convince the guards to disseminate their lie. HOW DO THEY INCENTIVIZE THESE GUARDS TO SPREAD THEIR LIE? MONEY. AND IT WAS NO SMALL SUM OF MONEY. Whatever it took to get the guards to do it, they paid them. NOTE, ONCE AGAIN, THE INCREDIBLE BLINDNESS THAT SIN PRODUCES. WHAT AMOUNT OF MONEY IS WORTH YOUR SOUL? YOU JUST WITNESSED AN ANGEL. WHAT AMOUNT OF MONEY COULD EVER WORTH DENYING WHAT YOU JUST SAW? But mankind, in the blindness of his sin is willing to throw away FOREVER in order to have riches RIGHT NOW. THE LIE WAS LUDICROUS. “The guards are asleep, and the disciples came and stole him away.” “YOU MEAN THEY QUIETLY ROLLED THAT STONE AWAY FROM THE ENTRANCE OF THE TOMB?” “YOU MEAN YOU SLEPT THROUGH IT ALL?” THE LIE, FROM THEIR VANTAGEPOINT, ONLY HAD TO BE CONVINCING TO THE PEOPLE FOR WHOM IT MATTERED.

Christ Disciples & His Resurrection

April 21, 2024 • Richard Caldwell Jr. • Matthew 28:1–10

Introduction: God is giving testimony to His Son. He does so at the cross. He does so at His burial. He does so through the means of providence. He does so through the means of miracles. In every case He is fulfilling His Word. His testimony to His Son a testimony of fulfilled Scripture. In each case, we are presented with two responses. We are told how the disciples of Jesus are responding, and we are told how the enemies of Jesus are responding. Now we arrive at the greatest sign of all. Was Jesus of Nazareth the Son of God? Was Jesus the King of Israel? Was Jesus the Savior, the Lamb of God who takes away sins? IS THERE A WAY FOR ALL OF OUR SINS TO BE FORGIVEN? IS THERE A WAY FOR US TO BE RECONCILED TO OUR CREATOR? IS THERE A WAY TO HAVE ETERNAL LIFE — TO LIVE WITH SALVATION’S LIFE FOREVER? GOD’S ANSWER IS YES, AND THE PREEMINENT WAY THAT HE SAYS “YES” IS BY RAISING HIS SON FROM THE DEAD. You will remember that Jesus made reference to the prophet Jonah in the belly of the fish, and compared that to His resurrection, and HE CALLED IT A SIGN. The sign of the prophet Jonah. ESV Matthew 12:39 But he answered them, "An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign, but no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. 40 For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. Today we look at THAT SIGN — the resurrection of Jesus — and as we do, we will once again see two responses. This morning, we look at the response of disciples; tonight, we will look at the response of His enemies. We look at verses 1-10 under three headings. I. HEAVENLY WONDERS WITH GREAT FEAR (vs.1-4) The Sabbath day was over. The first day of the week (Sunday), which began with sundown the previous day, had reached the time when the sun dawns. Matthew tells us about two women. Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joseph (27:56). John tells us that these two women came when it was still dark (20:1). Mark (16:1-8) and Luke (24) told us the sun was just coming up. Morning is breaking and a new day is dawning in every sense of the word. These two women were not alone. Mark tells us that Salome was with them, Luke mentions Joanna, and other women (Luke 24:10), but Matthew focuses on these two Mary’s. Why were they coming? They were bringing spices to anoint the body of Jesus (Mark 16:1). WHY? WHEN NICODEMUS BROUGHT SPICES FOR CHRIST’S BURIAL? Perhaps these two women had watched that preparation and recognized that it was rushed, due to time, and wanted to do it more carefully. Or, maybe they simply wanted to demonstrate their own love for Jesus, honoring Him this way as well. BUT WHEN THEY ARRIVE AT THE TOMB, IT IS NOT AS THEY EXPECTED. Now, let me say that when you look at the four gospel accounts and the details concerning what these women met with at the tomb, it can be a bit confusing. And EVERYONE trying to put a timeline together of the events, can put one together that makes sense of the differences, but NO ONE can know for certain if they have reconstructed things exactly. You have four different accounts, reflecting eyewitness testimony, that you can be sure is inerrant (it is God’s Word), but differing due to the differing roles and circumstances of the people involved. So, instead of doing a harmony of these events, I simply want to focus on what Matthew emphasized in his account. A. BEFORE THE WOMEN ARRIVED